If they sold it as a software only product as originally intended, it would potentially compete with their hardware product offerings. I suspect that their intentions would be to bundle ZEVO with some pricey hardware. Quickly looking at GreenBytes' site, their offerings don't appear to be directed at the consumer/prosumer/tech hobbyist market. I can understand needing a revenue stream ASAP, but the sputtering progress and lack of communication is a great way to kill expectations for a new product. While I'm sure the wild fires in Woodland Park have slowed progress, Ten's Compliment's tiered release of their product was clearly not a good start. Hopefully this will free up Don Brady's time to focus on the technical aspects of getting ZEVO up and running as a real product. Ten's Complement has joined GreenBytes to continue their work and now they have more development support." Robinson says that GreenBytes will have more to share regarding ZEVO's future "down the line."
FreeBSD and Solaris/Illumos can read ZEVO's default-created zpools.As to the future of the project, GreenBytes' spokesman Michael Robinson responded to TUAW's inquiry: "ZEVO's ZFS on OS X is safe.
Maczfs vs zevo mac os#
One hopes that they release the full source code, as that's the only way out of that particular scenario.Īnd finally, you can always bail those drives out of Mac OS and into another OS to read them.
And even if you created a zpool on another implementation of ZFS, it's compatible with MacZFS if it was created with zpool v8 and zfs v2.Īs long as you're hosting that ZEVO-made zpool on Mac OS, which was created with ZEVO's default of zpool version 28, you're absolutely dependent upon the pleasure of ZEVO's owner staying in business and ever updating it. It supports everything that most ZFS users need. Apple's software never stopped only their involvement did.
Maczfs vs zevo for mac os#
However, there has always been a completely free implementation of ZFS for Mac OS at. And we hope that GreenBytes fulfills Ten's Complement's longstanding promises to release the ZEVO source code. That's just an endemic problem of free vs.
Maczfs vs zevo portable#
Silverjam, you're absolutely right to be concerned about using a proprietary implementation of even one of the world's most open standard and portable free software storage platforms. Will I be left with a whole bunch of high quality BetaMax tapes with no machine to play them on? I am worried that data integrity will be a side issue if Zevo is the only controller of the file system and it becomes obsolete. I am a little worried I am using the equivalent of "BetaMax" versus VHS at the moment (sorry if you're not born before the eighties as you won't understand that) in that I understand it is better/superior but is it the practical way to go based on the fact that OSX hasn't chosen that path yet? Apple is known for taking their own path as we all know. When I say better I mean on an overall level (integration with OSX and apps etc) and file integrity level. I am looking to set up a Mirror on two drives once Gold is released.Īs I am not a techy so can someone give me the "Plain English" version of why ZFS is better that HFS OSX Journaled. I have started using ZFS formatting on an external drive with Zevo Silver (only what is available so far).
0 kommentar(er)
